I spent years producing comprehensive monthly reports that almost nobody read. They took two
weeks to build and influenced very little. The break came at a quarterly business review, when a
regional president interrupted me mid-slide.
He gestured at my share of voice chart. He had a specific problem. They were losing the digital
transformation narrative in key markets, competitors were being seen as innovation leaders while
his company was perceived as legacy, and he needed to know whether they were gaining or losing
ground and what he should do differently.
I had global sentiment. I had worldwide share of voice. I had competitive benchmarks against
five companies. I had nothing that answered him.
He had a decision to make. I had data. Those are different jobs, and my report was
excellent at the second one.
The persona statement
As a [role], I need [signal], so that I can
[outcome]. Borrowed from product development. If that sentence cannot be completed for your
top stakeholder, the program does not yet have a target.
Priority markets
Not global coverage. The specific regions where the
competitive battle is actually being fought, so a global average does not water them down.
The competitive set
Not everyone in the industry. The three or four
companies contesting the same narrative space, which differs by region and by stakeholder.
Source authority
Which outlets shape perception for this person,
ranked, so a tier-1 mention on the priority narrative outweighs ten in tier-3.
The reputation drivers
The narratives this business must win, and
their relative weight. One stakeholder's 40 percent is another's 15 percent, and a single
unweighted score hides that entirely.
The scope
Which outlets and markets are in scope for human
verification, and therefore what the measurement covers. This is printed on every
report that follows.