Certification · Participant Guide

Everything the review asks for, in one place.

What to read, what to build, how it is graded and how to submit, for all three credentials. This is the same guide every participant works from, published in full.

Welcome

You earn each credential by doing the work on a real stakeholder, not by passing a quiz. We review it against a published rubric, and when every criterion is met you hold the credential.

The certification follows Reputation Intelligence in the order the method runs. Discover who the reporting serves, measure coverage against what they need, then turn the score into a decision.

Credential The method step You can show that you Book chapter
Certified PBI® Practitioner Discover Scope a measurement program around the person who has to act on it Chapter 4
Certified MRS® Practitioner Measure Score coverage against that person's priorities and benchmark it against competitors Chapter 5
Certified SIGNAL Practitioner Act Turn a score into a decision with an owner, a timeline and an expected lift Chapter 6

Hold all three and the title Certified Reputation Intelligence Professional is added to your record.

How it runs

What you need

Before you start

Choose your stakeholder first. Everything you build is built for that one person, and a vague choice is the most common reason work comes back marked Not yet.

Two ways to choose

  1. Inside your own organization (preferred). A senior leader who makes decisions that reputation intelligence could inform: a regional president, the CFO, the head of product, the CHRO. You will have at least one real conversation with them.
  2. A public company, if you cannot use your own. Agency, consulting and academic participants often take this route. Pick a company from mrsindex.com or another with steady news coverage, and one named role at that company (for example, its CFO). Build the persona from public evidence: earnings calls, interviews, investor materials, executive posts. Say in your cover note that you took this route and list the sources you used.

A good stakeholder has a decision coming in the next 6 to 12 months, a business priority you can name in one sentence, and enough coverage in their market to score: at least 40 articles across their company and two competitors over the period you choose.

Confidentiality

Use of AI tools

You may use AI tools to draft, summarize or tidy your work. The judgments have to be yours: who the stakeholder is, which outlets matter to them, how an article reads for their company, what to recommend. Say in your cover note which tools you used and for what. Work that reads as generated without judgment, such as generic personas, unread articles or untraceable figures, will not pass. This is the same line the book draws in Chapter 7: AI for scale, human for judgment.

Credential 1: Certified PBI® Practitioner

You show that you can scope a measurement program around one stakeholder's decisions. The output is a complete Persona-Based Insights® scope that someone else could use to configure monitoring without asking you a question.

Read

By the end you can

The work, step by step

  1. Hold the discovery conversation. About 35 minutes, following the PBI® Conversation Guide in Chapter 4: opening (2 minutes), their world (10), their intelligence needs (10), timing (5), delivery preferences (5), closing (3). Listen more than you talk. Write up your notes within 24 hours. Public-company route: assemble the same answers from public sources instead, and note where each came from.
  2. Complete the PBI® Builder. All four steps: the Business Priority, the Persona Canvas, the Signal (3 to 5 reputation pillars, evidence of progress, early warning signals) and the Agile Persona Statement. Use Load a worked example first to see Henrik's version.
  3. Score your markets in the Priority Markets Map: Strategic Value, Narrative Priority, Risk Level and Media Ecosystem, each 1 to 5. If your stakeholder's business sits in one country, map regions, segments or channels within it instead.
  4. Weight the outlets in the Media Weighting Matrix: at least 10 outlets, each scored on Reach, Relevance, Relationship and Executive Attention. Build it for this persona, not for the company in general.
  5. Score the competitors in the Competitor Influence Scorecard: 5 to 10 companies on Strategic Importance, Innovation Strength, Executive Voice, Market Overlap and Narrative Authority.
  6. Validate. Take 30 minutes with your stakeholder to check the four tools reflect their priorities, and record what changed. Public-company route: test your scope against the company's latest earnings call or investor presentation instead, and record what you adjusted.

You submit

Check yourself before you submit

Credential 2: Certified MRS® Practitioner

You show that you can score coverage against your stakeholder's priorities, roll it up into a Media Reputation Score® and benchmark it against competitors. The output answers three questions: where do we stand, why, and what should we do.

Read

By the end you can

The work, step by step

  1. Set up the pillars. Carry the 3 to 5 pillars from your PBI® scope into the Pillar Definitions tab of the MRS® Scoring Guide, with keywords and example headlines for each. Set the weights so they total 100%, and tie each weight to what your stakeholder told you.
  2. Write 2 or 3 key messages. Precise statements that would advance the business priority if they appeared in coverage (Chapter 5 gives the pattern).
  3. Gather coverage. One month or one quarter for your company and your two highest Close Watch competitors. Fold syndicated copies, so one story is scored once.
  4. Score at least 40 articles across the three companies, with at least 20 for your stakeholder's company. Read each one. Score Source Authority from your Media Weighting Matrix tiers, then Prominence, Salience, Sentiment toward the company specifically, Key Message alignment and Voice, and assign a pillar.
  5. Show your judgment. Note at least 3 articles where your score differs from what a platform or AI tool assigned, or from what the headline suggests, and say why: sarcasm, framing, a niche outlet that matters, a competitor-focused piece.
  6. Roll it up in the MRS® Roll-up Calculator: normalized article scores, pillar averages, the weighted overall MRS® and the same for each competitor.
  7. Write the read. One page, three parts: the Diagnosis (where you stand, and why), the Competitive Gap (what the leader is doing differently, with numbers), the Action Path (specific moves, owners, timing, and a success measure).

You submit

A note on the two MRS® models. The credential grades the scoring method in the book, which is what the tools teach. The four-pillar model on the Media Reputation Score page is the same idea applied at scale on open data, and that page shows how one maps to the other.

Check yourself before you submit

Credential 3: Certified SIGNAL Practitioner

You show that you can turn a score into a decision. The output is a SIGNAL brief your stakeholder could approve the same day, the proof chain that follows it, and a 90-day plan to make it routine.

Read

By the end you can

The work, step by step

  1. Pick the finding. One finding from your MRS® read that matters to your stakeholder's priority. Name its pattern: Erosion Alert, Momentum Opportunity, Competitive Threat or Crisis Signal.
  2. Write the brief in the SIGNAL Brief Template:
    • Signal: one sentence, a metric, a direction, a time boundary.
    • Implication: the business consequence for this stakeholder, not a communications metric.
    • Gap: the specific absence or vulnerability, pointing toward the action.
    • Narrative: the emerging story, specific to this company.
    • Action: one to three actions, each with an owner and a date, and a budget where relevant.
    • Lift: the expected outcome, quantified and time-bound, with the assumption and your confidence stated.
    • Set the urgency level, then write the executive summary last and place it first.
  3. Review and calibrate using Step 5 of the Activation Workflow: the action sits within the stakeholder's authority, the timeline is realistic, the budget holds up, and someone could carry it out without asking a question.
  4. Deliver it in your stakeholder's preferred format and timing, and record their response. Public-company route: write a short note on how, when and to whom you would deliver it, and what response you would look for.
  5. Build the proof chain in the Proof Chain Builder: signal detected, brief delivered, decision made, outcome. If the outcome is not in yet, mark the decision status honestly (Pending is fine) and state what you will measure, and when.
  6. Plan the next 90 days in the 90-Day Implementation Roadmap: what it takes to run this every month for your stakeholder, with the Go/No-Go checkpoint at the end of each month.

You submit

Check yourself before you submit

Your 90 days

All three credentials fit in 13 weeks at 3 to 5 hours a week. You can submit each credential as soon as it is ready, which gets you feedback early, or submit everything together.

Weeks Credential What you do Done when
1 to 2 PBI® Read Chapters 1, 3 (Section 2) and 4. Choose your stakeholder. Hold the discovery conversation. Conversation notes written up
3 to 4 PBI® Complete the PBI® Builder, the Priority Markets Map and the Media Weighting Matrix. Persona statement drafted, markets and outlets tiered
5 PBI® Complete the Competitor Influence Scorecard. Validate with your stakeholder. Submit PBI® (optional early submission)
6 to 7 MRS® Read Chapters 5 and 7. Set up pillars, weights and key messages. Gather coverage. Coverage folded and ready to score
8 to 9 MRS® Score at least 40 articles. Roll up. Write the one-page read. Submit MRS® (optional early submission)
10 to 11 SIGNAL Read Chapters 6 and 9. Write, review and deliver the SIGNAL brief. Brief delivered and response recorded
12 to 13 SIGNAL Build the proof chain and the 90-day roadmap. Submit SIGNAL, and anything not yet submitted

The plan mirrors the book's own 90-Day Implementation Roadmap, so finishing the certification also leaves you with a working program for your stakeholder.

Check-ins. We send a short note at day 30 and day 60. Reply with anything that has you stuck. If life gets in the way, tell us before day 90 and we will agree a new date once.

How to submit

Email your files to info@measuredio.com with the subject line Certification submission: [Your name], [PBI® / MRS® / SIGNAL]. Attach them, or send one shared-folder link if they are large. We confirm receipt within 2 business days.

Name your files Lastname_Credential_Item, for example Garcia_PBI_Builder.pdf, Garcia_PBI_MediaWeighting.xlsx, Garcia_MRS_ArticleLog.xlsx, Garcia_SIGNAL_Brief.pdf.

Every submission includes a cover note of up to 500 words. It is where you show your reasoning, and reviewers read it first. Use this template:

Cover note

Name:
Credential(s) submitted:
Date:

STAKEHOLDER
Role and organization (or anonymized label):
Route: own organization / public company
The decision they face in the next 6 to 12 months:

WHAT I BUILT
In two or three sentences, the scope or result.

THE CHOICES I AM MOST SURE OF, AND WHY
1.
2.

THE CHOICE I AM LEAST SURE OF, AND WHY

FOR MRS®: THREE JUDGMENT CALLS
Article, the score I gave, what a platform or the headline suggested, and why I differed.
1.
2.
3.

FOR SIGNAL: THE PATTERN
Erosion Alert / Momentum Opportunity / Competitive Threat / Crisis Signal, and why.

AI TOOLS USED, AND FOR WHAT

SOURCES (PUBLIC-COMPANY ROUTE ONLY)

ANYTHING ELSE THE REVIEWER SHOULD KNOW

Before you send

The rubrics

Every criterion is marked Met or Not yet, with a written note. A credential is awarded when every criterion is met. We grade judgment, not formatting: a rough file with sound reasoning passes, a polished one without it does not.

PBI® Practitioner

Criterion Met when Common reasons for Not yet
1. Agile Persona Statement "As a [persona], I need [signal], so that I can [outcome]" is complete for a real, named role. The signal is specific (narrative, markets, competitors) and the outcome is a decision. Outcome is awareness or sentiment. Signal is "coverage" or "share of voice".
2. Business Priority Alignment One priority, why it matters, the KPIs it moves, the narrative to own and the competitors who threaten it. Three priorities. A priority that is a communications goal, not a business one.
3. Persona Canvas and signals Mandate, KPIs, decision cadence and upcoming windows, trusted sources and the proof they need. 3 to 5 reputation pillars, evidence of progress and early warning signals. Generic pillars copied from an industry framework with no link to this person.
4. Priority Markets Map Markets or segments scored on the four factors and tiered, with a reason for each Tier 1 choice. "Global". Every market in Tier 1.
5. Media Weighting Matrix At least 10 outlets scored on the four dimensions for this persona, tiered, with Executive Attention grounded in what they actually read. The same matrix any company in the industry would produce. Every outlet in Tier 1.
6. Competitor Influence Scorecard 5 to 10 competitors scored on the five dimensions. Close Watch reserved for those contesting the same narrative. The industry's top ten by revenue, unscored against the narrative.
7. Validated and usable The scope was checked with the stakeholder or against public evidence, changes are recorded, and a colleague could configure monitoring from it. No validation. Tools that contradict each other or the priority.

MRS® Practitioner

Criterion Met when Common reasons for Not yet
1. Pillars and weights from PBI® 3 to 5 pillars defined with keywords and examples. Weights total 100% and trace to the PBI® scope. Equal weights by default. Pillars that differ from the PBI® scope without explanation.
2. Key messages 2 or 3 precise statements tied to the business priority. Taglines. Messages no article could ever contain.
3. Article scoring At least 40 articles across the company and two competitors (20 or more for the company), scored on all six dimensions, syndicated copies folded, Source Authority from the Media Weighting Matrix. Scores entered without reading. Missing dimensions. Duplicates counted.
4. Human judgment At least 3 documented cases where the score departs from a platform, AI tool or headline reading, with sound reasons. Sentiment is toward the company specifically. No departures recorded. Article mood scored instead of treatment of the company.
5. Roll-up Normalization, pillar averages and the weighted overall MRS® are calculated correctly and shown. Volume plays no part in the score. Arithmetic errors. Pillar scores that rise with article count.
6. Competitive benchmark The same method applied to the competitors, with pillar-by-pillar gaps. Competitors scored on a different basis, or only overall.
7. Diagnosis, gap and action path The one-page read says where the company stands and why, what the leader does differently with numbers, and what to do, by whom and when, with a success measure. A description of the scores with no recommendation.

SIGNAL Practitioner

Criterion Met when Common reasons for Not yet
1. Signal One sentence with a metric, a direction and a time boundary, taken from the MRS® work. "Reputation is declining".
2. Implication The business consequence for this stakeholder's priority, in business terms. Communications consequences only. "This is concerning".
3. Gap A specific absence or vulnerability that points to where to act. "We need to do more".
4. Narrative A forward-looking story specific to this company and its priority. A narrative that fits any company in any industry.
5. Action One to three actions, each with an owner and a date, a budget where relevant, within the stakeholder's authority. No owner. No date. An action the stakeholder cannot approve.
6. Lift The expected outcome, quantified and time-bound, with the assumption and confidence stated. "This will help". A number with no basis.
7. Pattern and delivery The narrative pattern is named and the brief weights its components to match. Executive summary first. Delivered, or a delivery plan for the public-company route, in the stakeholder's format and timing. Every component given equal weight. No delivery or response recorded.
8. Proof chain and roadmap The proof chain records signal, brief, decision and outcome honestly, with what will be measured and when. The 90-day roadmap has owners, dates and Go/No-Go checkpoints. Outcomes claimed without evidence. A roadmap with no checkpoints.

After you submit

You hear back within 15 business days with a mark and a note on every criterion.

If every criterion is Met, the credential is awarded.

If any criterion is Not yet, you get specific feedback on what to change. One revision is included: resubmit within 30 days and we review only the criteria marked Not yet. If you disagree with a mark, reply with your reasoning and we will look again.

Founding Practitioners also get a 45-minute review call to walk through the feedback, and we ask for 15 minutes of your feedback on the process itself.

What you receive

Add it to LinkedIn

On your profile, choose Add profile section, then Licenses & certifications, and enter:

Field What to enter
Name Certified PBI® Practitioner (or MRS®, SIGNAL, or Reputation Intelligence Professional)
Issuing organization measuredI/O
Issue date The month on your certificate
Credential ID Your practitioner number, for example 012
Credential URL https://measuredio.com/certification/

Then share the badge in a post. Say what you built and for whom, in a sentence, without anything confidential. Tag measuredI/O so we can reshare it.

Questions at any point: info@measuredio.com.